lizziebelle: (Default)
lizziebelle ([personal profile] lizziebelle) wrote2009-01-23 08:35 am

another request


hand on heart
Originally uploaded by Lizzie~Belle.
I got a note today about this photo, which I took at Mount Auburn Cemetery in Watertown, MA. It's from a Dutch film company, wanting to use it in a production.

I took a lot of photos that day, and this one never really stood out in my mind as one of the better ones. Funny that it should be one that gets attention! But then, I never can guess which ones do. Some that I love get none, and then this little gem gets picked for international stardom. *g*

So, what do y'all think? Should I let them use it? I won't ask for any money, just a credit in the film. I kind of think it would be cool, but I wanted to get some feedback before I went for it. Thanks!

[identity profile] mabfan.livejournal.com 2009-01-23 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd say go ahead and let them use it.

[identity profile] queenoftheskies.livejournal.com 2009-01-23 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that would be most awesome!

[identity profile] maryjdal.livejournal.com 2009-01-23 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
That's very cool. I also think you should let them use it.

[identity profile] wordweaverlynn.livejournal.com 2009-01-23 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes!

[identity profile] chalkhorse.livejournal.com 2009-01-23 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)
sure why not?

[identity profile] firespirit1.livejournal.com 2009-01-23 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey, if I were you, I'd ask for a small fee as well. Not alot, I'm sure you could use $200 or so.

[identity profile] sea-dark-wine.livejournal.com 2009-01-23 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Some pictures are iconic, and speak to people. (With some, you don't know who they're gonna speak to, but they do...)

I'd say yes, let them use the photo, and maybe your name listed in the credits will lead to more people wanting your work. Yay!

[identity profile] ami-1.livejournal.com 2009-01-23 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Do it AND ask for money!

[identity profile] singingnettle.livejournal.com 2009-01-24 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
Why the heck shouldn't you get paid? They're using your art for a profit-making venture.

[identity profile] singingnettle.livejournal.com 2009-01-24 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
Here is my take on this, and I know it's going to come across as sounding angry but I'm not: Artists are not charitable institutions, unless they specifically want to provide art to something in lieu of a donation. Any production or publication can claim that they have a low budget, but they're responsible for buying what they need to create their production. You don't go into a store, pick up a $80 shirt, and expect that they'll give it to you for free because you have a "small budget," right? I also think that when we as artists give our work away or below market rate, it helps support the dynamic of artists not being paid for their work.

End of lecture. Do, of course, whatever makes you happiest.